
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>development dispute &#8211; realestatesource</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.realestatesource.com.au/tag/development-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au</link>
	<description>Commercial and residential property news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:21:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>NIMBYs Might Win Fight Against Major Brunswick Proposal, Melbourne</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/nimbys-might-win-fight-against-major-brunswick-proposal-melbourne/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brunswick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brunswick Development Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/nimbys-might-win-fight-against-major-brunswick-proposal-melbourne.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/294%20albert%20street%20brunswick.jpg" border="0" width="195" height="195" align="right" />THE Moreland City Council and developers are battling against the clock to get a contentious Brunswick project out of the ground before mid-2012, when the permit expires, and resident concerns regarding the proposal must then be heard.<br /><br />The 284 – 294 Albert Street block was the subject of a dispute last June when Brisbane-based owner Citimark proposed a $100 million apartment compound with three towers rising between 10 and 14-levels (impression, right).<br /><br />Citimark relied on a development overlay introduced in 1994 and specifically for the construction of a supermarket, next door, to bypass third-party appeal rights for its major proposal. <br />
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greens councilor Tony Archer said at the time local residents could “feel rightly disenfranchised” by Citimark’s proposal because few of them would have been part of the initial site consultation period 17 years ago. </p>
<p>Moreland City Council however supported the development and helped Citimark quietly obtain its permit. Council said construction must start by June 2010, or the permit will be void.</p>
<p>Citimark’s proposal will include nearly 200 flats, and a 1900 square metre retail component. It paid almost $9 million for the site in early February 2009. At the time of purchase it announced plans for the shopping centre, but not the residential component.</p>
<p>The block is now being onsold in a campaign managed by Colliers International’s Tim Storey and Brett Griffith. Sources speculate it should fetch about $10 million.</p>
<p>Around the corner, in East Brunswick, Little Project Development – the construction company of Toll executive Paul Little – is redeveloping the former Tip Top Bakery site as a $100 million mixed use village which will be identified by ten-level buildings. Little paid $11 million for the disused 1.25 hectare bakery in October 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Body Corporate Take on Sunland on Q1 Tower Defects</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/body-corporate-take-on-sunland-on-q1-tower-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Queensland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q1 Tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunland Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surfer's Paradise]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/body-corporate-take-on-sunland-on-q1-tower-defects.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/q1%20tower.jpg" border="0" width="86" height="142" align="right" />THE developer of Queensland’s landmark Q1 apartment building, on the Gold Coast, is involved in a legal dispute with its tenants.<br /><br />According to documents lodged with the Supreme Court, the body corporate of the building claims Sunland’s Q1 had “contained or developed defects in the coating system” since construction.<br /><br />The body corporate claims defects and corrosion in the building would “compromise long term durability and appearance of Q1 and require repair.”<br />
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Residents add “the cost of required repairs is not yet known but is likely to be millions of dollars.”</p>
<p>Sunland Group chief told the AFR he is confident there will be a resolution “which will include the body corporate accepting that it failed to maintain a proper maintenance regime for the building.”</p>
<p>He added “the body corporate has a due care to maintaining the building and in this instance a proper regime has not been upheld.”</p>
<p>“I think everyone is entitled to their own views but justice will prevail.”</p>
<p>Developed in 2005, and pipping Melbourne’s Eureka Tower as Australia’s tallest residential building, the 80-level tower includes 526 apartments.</p>
<p>In 2009, an owners corporation of a Pyrmont apartment block, in Sydney, won $3.1 million and set a precedent for what constitutes systemic default in buildings.</p>
<p>Walter Constructions was the building of that Harris Street property.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bovis Lend Lease Being Investigated For New York Dealings</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/bovis-lend-lease-being-investigated-for-new-york-dealings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional announcement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/bovis-lend-lease-being-investigated-for-new-york-dealings.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><br />BOVIS LEND LEASE said it has been subpoenaed, and will cooperate fully with authorities, regarding concerns about  billing practices adopted for a number of its United States developments, including the New York Mets stadium, and the September 11 memorial, in New York.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The controversy is believed to have been sparked by former Bovis Lend Lease employee Brian Aryai, who wrote a letter to Lend Lease chairman David Crawford in March, which was provided to the New York District Attorney, Robert Morgenthau.</p>
<p>Below is a statement Lend Lease released yesterday, regarding the investigation:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Lend Lease Corporation Limited (“Lend Lease”) refers to recent media reports regarding investigations being conducted by the US Federal Attorney and New York<br />District Attorney of its subsidiary Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. (“Bovis Lend Lease”) in New York.</p>
<p>Lend Lease advises that Bovis Lend Lease New York has received subpoenas and is fully cooperating with the authorities.</p>
<p>The investigations arise from allegations made by a former employee. These include an allegation relating to billing practices in respect of foremen taken out of the union pool where excess costs incurred by Bovis Lend Lease for payments made to union foremen were billed to clients. The union pool is a source of labour available to contractors in New York which is used by Bovis Lend Lease.</p>
<p>Bovis Lend Lease is conducting its own investigation of the matters raised and will assist the authorities wherever possible. Bovis Lend Lease will also take whatever remedial action is appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALP&#8217;s Commission Flat Building Boom Underway Without Community Consultation</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/alps-commission-flat-building-boom-underway-without-community-consultation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geelong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin madden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Struthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tanya plibersek]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/alps-commission-flat-building-boom-underway-without-community-consultation.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/commission%20flat%202.jpg" border="0" align="right" />THE Federal Government’s contentious plan to build record amounts of commission flats and social housing around your streets, and without proper community consultation – seems to finally have caught the attention of the wider community.<br /><br />Despite anger in some States that details about the mass roll-out of commission flats have been deliberately kept from the community – the State ALP governments are pushing ahead with major public housing projects.<br /><br />State governments need to do so in an attempt to collect part of the massive taxpayer-funded $5.6 billion the Federal ALP government has allocated to the initiative, for projects completed before a 2012 deadline.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ALP wants to add 80,000 social and affordable housing to Australian streets pronto. Many developers who lodged plans with council are now re-lodging applications, with a “percentage” of social housing – to be operated by a housing co-operative &#8211; in an attempt to speed through an approval, and help the ALP governments with their aims.</p>
<p>In Queensland recently, ALP housing minister Karen Struthers called for “tolerance” in welcoming an increasing surge of public housing residents to its neighbourhoods.</p>
<p>In Victoria, Planning Minister Justin Madden “called in” (approved without community consultation) several social housing projects, which did not need to be publicly advertised, because of a temporary change in the law last year, and soon after the initiative was announced.</p>
<p>Kelvin Thompson, the federal minister for Wills and Jane Garrett, the ALP candidate for Brunswick, in Melbourne, have both acknowledged in The Age today, the government’s failure to consult the community over public housing redevelopment. </p>
<p>However despite the acknowledgement, little seems to be done to change it.</p>
<p>When quizzed about the fast-tracking of projects in the scheme, Federal Housing Minister Tanya Plibersek handpassed a response, telling The Age “such issues were a matter for the state”.</p>
<p>In Queensland, the government has recently said it would not let protesters get in the way of social housing construction.</p>
<p>Mr Madden, again speaking via a spokeswoman, told The Age rather conclusively: “Meeting these time frames ensures Victoria receives its share of nation building funding and boosts its social housing stock across the State.”</p>
<p>Major social housing projects in Coburg and Geelong, in Victoria recently started construction before residents were consulted.</p>
<p>Mr Madden, a former AFL footballer, is facing his second vote of no confidence in a year, over an email sent to him by a media adviser outlining a sham consultation process for the Windsor Hotel redevelopment, in which it would be claimed the politician listened to the public, in rejecting an application.</p>
<p>In Melbourne, a major 128-hectare proposal for Department of Defence land on the banks of the Maribyrnong River, in Cordite Avenue, Maribyrnong, near Highpoint, will include “at least” 20 per cent social and affordable housing. </p>
<p>VicUrban will assume control of the prominent Maribyrnong site in 2012 and proceed with the development, which was not seen by the community, prior to VicUrban announcing plans for the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Related articles:</p>
<p><a href="government-tells-community-to-be-tolerant-as-brisbane-gold-coast-sunshine-coast-all-to-receive-more-social-housing.html">Government Tells Community to be Tolerant as Brisbane, Gold Coast, Sunshine Coast All to Receive More Social Housing </a></p>
<p><span class="small"> </span> <a href="institutions-encouraged-to-apply-for-third-stage-of-the-national-rental-affordability-scheme.html"> Institutions Encouraged to Apply For Third Stage of the National Rental Affordability Scheme </a></p>
<p><a href="public-housing-residents-want-air-conditioning.html"> </a></p>
<p><a href="major-160-million-public-housing-based-development-likely-to-proceed-near-melbourne-airport.html">Major $160 Million Public Housing-Based Development Likely to Proceed Near Melbourne Airport </a></p>
<p><a href="public-housing-residents-want-air-conditioning.html"><span class="small"> </span> </a><a href="public-housing-residents-want-air-conditioning.html"> Public Housing Residents Want Air Conditioning </a></p>
<p><span class="small"> </span> <a href="public-housing-boom-for-nsw.html"> Public Housing Boom For NSW </a></p>
<p><a href="public-housing-building-boom-underway-in-australia.html">Public Housing Building Boom Underway in Australia </a></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australand Unveils $160 Million Kangaroo Point Project, Brisbane</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/australand-unveils-160-million-kangaroo-point-project-brisbane/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Queensland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brisbane residential apartment project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/australand-unveils-160-million-kangaroo-point-project-brisbane.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="caption" src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/yungaba%20house.jpg" border="0" alt="Yungaba House" title="Yungaba House" align="right" />AUSTRALAND has unveiled plans for its $160 million Kangaroo Point apartment project in Brisbane.</p>
<p>The controversial project will be developed on Brisbane's historic Yungaba House site, which was the first property to be put on the state's heritage register in 1992. The State government sold the site to Australand.</p>
<p>The project will include 68 units in the first stage, and ten luxury homes in the second stage, which will be built into the historic riverfront home.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further stages will sell an approximate 90 more apartments, bringing the total to 167 dwellings. An official public launch will be unveiled in February.</p>
<p>Australand Queensland general manager Nigel Edgar told the AFR: &#8220;We decided to change the mix of the project as we thought we could do a better job of it and we have adapted it to suit the current market conditions.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We see Brisbane as a market that will grow in the future and we think this is a really strong site and well positioned t take advantage of the current pent-up demand&#8221;.</p>
<p>The 1.9 hectare site is under the Story Bridge, and faces New Farm.</p>
<p>Australand expects the project to be completed by 2013. The development will also include pools, a recreation centre, gymnasium and riverfront kiosk.</p>
<p>Colliers International is marketing apartments and townhouses on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westfield Lobbies Geelong Council Against Permitting Rival Shopping Centre</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/westfield-lobbies-geelong-council-against-permitting-rival-shopping-centre/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 04:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Geelong City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moolap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/westfield-lobbies-geelong-council-against-permitting-rival-shopping-centre.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/westfield2.jpg" border="0" align="right" />RETAIL giant Westfield has successfully lobbied against plans by Geelong-based builder and investor Costa Group to rezone a prominent collection of Moolap properties, including what was once a major indoor tennis centre.<br /><br />Westfield, along with shopping centres Newcomb Central, Bellarine Village and local businesses argued to the Greater Geelong City Council that a rezoning request pitched by Costa – which could have allowed it to build a big shopping centre - would negatively affect designated Activity Centres allocated around Geelong’s suburbs.<br />
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout planning, Costa’s site was referred to as 151 Bellarine Highway. It includes adjoining properties between Coppards Road and Twitt Street including the Peninsula Motel, an animal hospital, service station, warehouse buildings and a car park.</p>
<p>On Geelong’s south-eastern outskirts, the Moolap site is prominent to commuters taking the Bellarine Highway to holiday hamlets Ocean Grove, Point Lonsdale, Portarlington and St Leonards.</p>
<p>As well as a shopping centre, the Mixed Use Zone request would have allowed Costa (or any subsequent owner of the site) flexibility to build residential, commercial and industrial buildings.</p>
<p>Council officially abandoned the proposal at a meeting last week after receiving a report from an independent panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Overturns Frank Sartor&#8217;s Controversial Bayside Projects</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/court-overturns-frank-sartors-controversial-bayside-projects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[New South Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal residential development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/court-overturns-frank-sartors-controversial-bayside-projects.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>THE New South Wales Land and Environmental Court has made void a development permit for the state's biggest housing development, saying its approval was affected by "a reasonable apprehension of bias" by former ALP planning minister Frank Sartor.</p>
<p>Justice David Henry Lloyd overturned the approval of almost 800 homes in southern Lake Macquarie, because the planning minister at the time, the Labor Party's Frank Sartor - "might not have been impartial and unprejudiced in his decision" about the project.<br /><br />
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Mr Sartor&#8217;s development company Rose Property Group was set to build 600 homes in the heritage seaside hamlet of Catherine Hill Bay, and another 187 at Gwandalan, further south.</p>
<p>Last September, Mr Sartor described the planning process as &#8220;lengthy, thorough and transparent&#8221;.</p>
<p>But the Court found Mr Sartor drove negotiations for his development company to build in the areas as early as 2006, and despite the fact Catherine Hill Bay and Gwandalan weren&#8217;t included in the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy at that stage.</p>
<p>Justice Lloyd also said Mr Sartor repeatedly stated as fact that the development was going ahead, long before approval was even considered.</p>
<p>&#8220;Far from bringing an impartial mind to his determination, the minister committed himself to bringing a partial mind to the application,&#8221; Mr Lloyd said.</p>
<p>The NSW State Government will not appeal the decision, according to today&#8217;s Daily Telegraph. Mr Sartor was dumped last year, the day after obtaining development approval for the Catherine Hill Bay, and Gwandalan project.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>$100 Million Darlinghurst Cancer Centre Objected by Lord Mayor</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/100-million-darlinghurst-cancer-centre-objected-by-lord-mayor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[New South Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning dispute]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/100-million-darlinghurst-cancer-centre-objected-by-lord-mayor.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/delta%20goodrem.jpg" border="0" alt="Delta Goodrem" title="Delta Goodrem" width="145" height="113" align="right" /><br />PLANS to build a $100 million cancer centre in Sydney's ritzy inner-eastern suburb of Darlinghust are in jeopardy, after a group of local residents and Lord Mayor Clover Moore, said the development would "cannibalise" their suburb.</p><p>Mr Moore said the proposed 11-storey building - which was launched by singer Delta Goodrem last October - risks blocking sunlight to nearby homes, and will also cause traffic chaos.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A spokeswoman for the Mayor told the Daily Telegraph: &#8220;While Clover shares local community support for the health facilities, she also shares their concern that all institutions need to be good neighbours and ensure major development does not impact unduly on adjacent residential areas.&#8221;</p>
<p>Residents agree, saying the proposed Garvan St Vincents Cancer Clinic building will take away from the heritage landscape of Darlinghust, and limit light to a nearby park.</p>
<p>Darlinghust Residents&#8217; Action Group Jo Holder questioned the need for the centre to be developed, adding locals are concerned the project could include offices (doctor&#8217;s consulting rooms) and a ground floor retail precinct and become highly commercialised, something the hospital has denied.</p>
<p>St Vincent&#8217;s Hospital spokesman David Faktor said it believes &#8220;the proposed cancer centre will not pose any unreasonable impacts on the local environment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plans Lodged to Subdivide Historic Phillip Island Homestead</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/plans-lodged-to-subdivide-historic-phillip-island-homestead/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 04:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Woolamai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grocon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grollo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phillip island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sorrento]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/plans-lodged-to-subdivide-historic-phillip-island-homestead.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/woolamai%20house.jpg" border="0" width="167" height="118" align="right" />ANOTHER establishment family is lobbying to slice and dice their substantial holiday home retreat.<br /><br />This time, on Phillip Island, the Grollo family have submitted plans to subdivide the historic eight hectare estate, Woolamai House (pictured, right), which was built in 1876 for wealthy hotelier and horse trainer John Cleeland and is one of Victoria’s oldest coastal homesteads.<br /><br />Woolamai House includes an Italianite Gothic mansion and gardens with heritage plantings abutting the Cape Woolamai foreshore, all of which are included on the Victorian Heritage Register.<br />
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Development stalwart Bruno Grollo bought the prominent house in 1982. However, citing a lack of use, his son Daniel, who now runs the family construction business, tried to sell the estate for $8 million in 2007 before withdrawing it from the market.</p>
<p>Overlooking Cleeland Bight and the Phillip Island Bridge, Woolamai House appears on the council’s Bass Coast Planning Scheme as being suitable for residential development. </p>
<p>Grollo’s new application, which is being exhibited, would see the estate split into 69 blocks – the smallest, at 460 square metres. “Small high density development” would be permitted. </p>
<p>Across Western Port, in Sorrento, Myer family member Richard Shelmerdine was recently granted approval by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to split a historic property, The Sisters at 3080 Point Nepean Road, five ways.</p>
<p>In January, when the first block within that subdivision was listed for sale (and later sold for some $6 million), In April, another larger piece hit the market with price expectations of $10 million. Mr Shelmerdine paid $18.4 million for the entire 1.2 hectare block in 2008.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deaf Children Australia to Sell a Portion of its St Kilda Road Site</title>
		<link>https://www.realestatesource.com.au/deaf-children-australia-to-sell-a-portion-of-its-st-kilda-road-site/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Pallisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Road Development Site Sale]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/deaf-children-australia-to-sell-a-portion-of-its-st-kilda-road-site.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="caption" src="http://realestatesource.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/597%20st%20kilda%20road%20lot%201.jpg" border="0" title="Lot 1, 597 St Kilda Road, Melbourne" width="358" height="179" align="right" />APARTMENT construction at the bottom end of Albert Park Lake looks set to intensify with Deaf Children Australia listing major residential development site for sale, abutting Wesley College’s St Kilda Road campus.<br /><br />Local agency sources expect DCA will reap between $16 - $20 million from the sale of the 5471 square metre site which is being marketed as a multi-level development site at lot 1, 597 St Kilda Road. <br /><br />Most of the site is an open air car park with frontage to (the less exclusive) High Street, just west of Punt Road. The precinct is classified as Melbourne, with postcode 3004, however many of the occupants in the area, including Wesley and the Alfred Hospital, also classify their addresses as Prahran.<br />
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DCA just squeezes under the control of the City of Melbourne council, which has recently proven more adventurous in regard to redevelopment approval than neighbouring councils Port Phillip and Stonnington.</p>
<p>However under the stewardship of new Planning Minister Matthew Guy, and given the Baillieu government’s mandate to curb rampant and random Sydney-esque skyscraper redevelopment, it’s not yet known how the DCA site will be received by developers, especially in a market agents agree has been in downturn for some months.</p>
<p>The DCA is hedging its bets, also marketing the site for sale or lease as a school, or hospital. Kliger Wood’s Nick Breheny and Eugene Wood are the marketing agents.</p>
<p>Elsewhere in the immediate area, Evolve Development is planning to replace the former Suntory restaurant at 74 Queens Road with a 225+ unit skyscraper. </p>
<p>The Peloton Group also plans to replace one of the precinct’s last remaining historic mansions, at 70 Queens Road, with Proximity, a 12-level complex with 159 apartments. </p>
<p>Meanwhile at 541 St Kilda Road, next door to the Alfred, developer Hudson Conway is planning a 258-unit apartment skyscraper on land it paid Stockland approximately $20.5 million for in March.</p>
<p>The Victorian College of the Deaf, an occupant on the DCA site, is opposing the sale, which would likely result in the demolition of buildings and established gardens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
